W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: How to specify an object that can be mutable or immutable

From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 10:55:53 +0200
To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@annevk.nl>
Cc: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.w30gffheidj3kv@simons-macbook-pro.local>
On Wed, 25 Sep 2013 15:46:22 +0200, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>  
wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote:
>> Ah, OK. It's not quite the same since they use [NoInterfaceObject] and
>> implements, whereas DOMRect and DOMRectReadOnly would presumably be  
>> normal
>> interfaces.
>
> Why are these prefixed with DOM?

What Tab said. But I can bring up the idea of dropping the prefix.

> Also, if they still have the same
> restrictions as to what they represent as before, giving them a less
> specific name seems bad. Or is the intent to make them represent any
> rectangle?

Yes.

-- 
Simon Pieters
Opera Software
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2013 08:56:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:37:50 UTC