W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: Unordered setsmaps, for when ordering is hard/expensive/unwanted?

From: Brendan Eich <brendan@secure.meer.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 10:32:48 -0700
Message-ID: <5224CBC0.100@secure.meer.net>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
Consulting with bz and dbaron, it sounds like you're right: 
implementations won't be able to swallow the "as if self-hosted" 
overhead that's required to keep canonical "insertion" order preserved 
for later reflection.

Bjoern still makes a good point. Studying Go as you suggest could help, 
but I think only in discovering "true positive" results ("positive" in 
disease-testing sense). If all seems well, that is unfortunately not 
enough assurance.

(Data races that I'm concerned about are among JS-programmable threads, 
so workers -- not network.)

Received on Monday, 2 September 2013 17:33:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:37:50 UTC