- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 16:16:02 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23056 --- Comment #11 from Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen@wirfs-brock.com> --- (In reply to comment #10) > This is pretty straightforward to spec in a way that matches ES6 without > resorting to ES6 syntax. > ... > But even better then trying to replicate the results of the ES6 ExpectedArguemntCount would be to just specify the translation of WebIDL argument declarations into ES6 FormalParameter syntax. Then it becomes completely up to ES to define the initial value of the 'length' property. In general we should be looking for ways to eliminate unnecessary redundancy between WebIDL and ES. Much better to have a single concept spec'ed at exactly one place. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 28 August 2013 16:16:04 UTC