W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: [webidl] Spec for callback interface interface objects is self-contradictory in places

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2013 10:25:21 +1000
Message-ID: <51FC4DF1.2070107@mcc.id.au>
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
CC: public-script-coord@w3.org
Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> Why should constants on an inherited interface force the existence of an
> interface object for the inherited callback interface?

Yeah good point.

http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2006/webapi/WebIDL/Overview.xml.diff?r1=1.656;r2=1.657;f=h
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2006/webapi/WebIDL/v1.xml.diff?r1=1.96;r2=1.97;f=h
Received on Saturday, 3 August 2013 00:25:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:37:50 UTC