- From: Norbert Lindenberg <ecmascript@lindenbergsoftware.com>
- Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 11:59:07 -0700
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Cc: Norbert Lindenberg <ecmascript@lindenbergsoftware.com>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
If I read the spec correctly, XMLHttpRequest is not serializable. Norbert On Jul 28, 2013, at 11:25 , Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU> wrote: > On 7/28/13 11:24 AM, Norbert Lindenberg wrote: >> In our previous discussion of ByteString [1] I thought we had consensus that if ByteString exists at all then its only purpose is to help in the specification of APIs for poorly designed legacy parts of protocols such as HTTP. Why should HTTPLegacyByteString be serializable? > > It only needs to be serializable if we have objects that have HTTPLegacyByteString attributes and we want JSON.stringify on those objects to include those attributes, basically. > > -Boris >
Received on Sunday, 28 July 2013 18:59:35 UTC