W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: Promises "if not omitted" language

From: Juan Ignacio Dopazo <dopazo.juan@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 11:55:32 -0300
Message-ID: <CA+ejddXMgsCP+GWrFgdXD3V9daBncY+spWWUrzc6M+ybLn-HEg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Cc: Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
2013/7/22 Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>

> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Domenic Denicola
> <domenic@domenicdenicola.com> wrote:
> > Until then we'll probably need to update the spec to use `any` as the
> argument type and perform argument validation manually.
>
> Given the number of specifications adopting promises, fixing this in
> DOM is not really addressing the problem.
>
>  The DOM spec is setting the bar for the future of promises in ES. If
possible it should be fixed early.

Do you have any thoughts on the IsCallable() change?

Juan
Received on Tuesday, 23 July 2013 14:56:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:37:50 UTC