Re: WebIDL grammar allows "static;", which seems broken

On 7/22/13 10:04 PM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
> OK, this should be fixed now.
>
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2006/webapi/WebIDL/Overview.xml.diff?r1=1.641;r2=1.642;f=h

Looks pretty good.

There are two stray references to "Qualifier" in 3.2.2 and 3.2.3 that 
are now dead links and should probably talk about "static" and 
"stringifier" instead).

-Boris

Received on Tuesday, 23 July 2013 04:59:13 UTC