W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: IDL: number types

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 07:02:54 -0400
Message-ID: <CADnb78jhFSMSMVZoHmHud519q2Qw9RMYuRyFKwLuh6fezVM-qw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Cc: public-script-coord@w3.org
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:
> On 3/18/13 9:59 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> Now ES6 will define ArrayBuffer and friends, can we move IDL to a
>> integer/float model
> I'm not sure what you mean by that.  Is there some context I should read up
> on?

The context is continued complaints about IDL's mismatch with
JavaScript. The last time I brought up simplification of the various
numeric types it was brought up that ArrayBuffer and friends relied on
the various C types. Now ArrayBuffer will no longer rely on them by
being natively defined in ES6 I was wondering whether we could do
this, or if there are some other reasons why we have these types that
do not match JavaScript's floating point.

Received on Tuesday, 19 March 2013 11:03:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:37:48 UTC