W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > April to June 2013

[Bug 22392] New: maybe define .name for Function objects corresponding to operations/attributes

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 21:52:22 +0000
To: public-script-coord@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-22392-3890@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22392

            Bug ID: 22392
           Summary: maybe define .name for Function objects corresponding
                    to operations/attributes
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: WebAppsWG
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: PC
                OS: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: WebIDL
          Assignee: cam@mcc.id.au
          Reporter: cam@mcc.id.au
        QA Contact: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-script-coord@w3.org

It sounds like ES might define .name on functions at some point, so we probably
want to define what its value is for the Function objects we have for
operations, attribute getters/setters, etc.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Monday, 17 June 2013 21:52:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:37:49 UTC