W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: WebIDL should define "native Array"

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:52:37 +1000
Message-ID: <51BEB235.6080202@mcc.id.au>
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
CC: public-script-coord@w3.org
Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> WebIDL uses the term "native Array" in a few places, but doesn't define
> it in ES terms. Presumably this should be defined as an object for which
> Array.isArray tests true? What about proxies around arrays?

All but one use of this term have disappeared, now that we have allowed 
most objects to be converted to IDL sequences.  The remaining use, in 
the first sentence of #es-array, is not normative, so I'm going to leave 
it as is.
Received on Monday, 17 June 2013 06:56:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:37:49 UTC