- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 15:21:41 +0100
- To: "Mark S. Miller" <erights@google.com>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Sean Hogan <shogun70@westnet.com.au>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Mark S. Miller <erights@google.com> wrote: > Me too. I find your points about why AP2 (recursive unwrapping of callback > argument) is superior to AP3 (recursive unwrapping of callback result) > persuasive. Interesting, how would that work? -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 3 June 2013 14:22:14 UTC