Re: Future feedback

On 5/14/13 7:54 PM, Mark S. Miller wrote:
> I see. I was thinking primarily about incoming queues whereas this
> formulates the issue primarily in terms of outgoing queues.

Ah, that's an interesting point.  I think that's because Ian focused on 
the page-observable aspect of things, and what pages observe is the 
tasks executing.

> I like it. AFAICT, this is a better way to specify
> communicating event loops in all ways. Thanks!

Thank hixie.  ;)

-Boris

Received on Wednesday, 15 May 2013 00:58:59 UTC