Why is [Constructor] not allowed on partial interfaces?

• From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
• Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 10:44:27 -0400
• To: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <5187C1CB.2050606@mit.edu>

Is there a reason [Constructor] is not allowed on partial interfaces? 
Seems like adding a new constructor signature in a partial interface 
ought to be ok...

-Boris

Received on Monday, 6 May 2013 14:44:57 UTC