- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 11:51:05 +0200
- To: "'Mark S. Miller'" <erights@google.com>, "'Tab Atkins Jr.'" <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: "'Domenic Denicola'" <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>, "'Jonas Sicking'" <jonas@sicking.cc>, <public-script-coord@w3.org>
On Friday, May 03, 2013 1:40 AM, Mark S. Miller wrote: > On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Domenic Denicola > <domenic@domenicdenicola.com> wrote: > > From: Jonas Sicking [jonas@sicking.cc] > > > >> (... lots of really good stuff ...) > > > > I agree with everything you wrote, both in the technical content > > and in the tone. I appreciate the tone as a counterpoint to the > > two extreme voices we've heard from so far, and in particular it's > > great you've given some perspective on the WebApps WG process > > which I don't think many people in this discussion have. It's also > > really good that you phrased things as "noodling over the Future > > API" instead of "we produced a spec, you didn't, so STFU". > > Jonas, along with Domenic, I would like to thank you as well for > shifting tone, and for your clarification of history. I appreciate > the reasons for not withdrawing one draft standard until an adequate > replacement appears -- provided that the draft is treated as > tentative in the spirit stated in your email. The way it is currently pushed, it doesn't seem to be a "tentative draft". For example, a lot of people requested that we change the JSON-LD API to use Futures instead of callbacks. It would be great to clarify the standing of this document. -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Friday, 3 May 2013 09:51:41 UTC