Re: Future cancellation

On 5/1/13 at 1:37 PM, jackalmage@gmail.com (Tab Atkins Jr.) wrote:

> Ah, I'm not proposing that we augment the base Future class with
> cancellation properties.  I explicitly used the term "subtype" in the
> quoted bit above.  *Some* of Ron's suggestions were to augment the
> base Future class, but not all of them, and several other people
> pushed back on that.

I think that covers the issue.

Cheers - Bill

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz        | Re: Computer reliability, performance, and security:
408-356-8506       | The guy who *is* wearing a parachute is *not* the
www.pwpconsult.com | first to reach the ground.  - Terence Kelly

Received on Thursday, 2 May 2013 00:43:36 UTC