W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: What Are We Arguing About? (was: Re: A Challenge Problem for Promise Designers)

From: Andreas Rossberg <rossberg@google.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 16:25:38 +0200
Message-ID: <CADjR9NraPGnx6L4gdmATtBnG538s3GCBz_qjyuzkgzOdZUgr+g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Miller <erights@gmail.com>
Cc: Dean Landolt <dean@deanlandolt.com>, David Bruant <bruant.d@gmail.com>, "Mark S. Miller" <erights@google.com>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, Dean Tribble <tribble@e-dean.com>, es-discuss <es-discuss@mozilla.org>
On 26 April 2013 17:58, Mark Miller <erights@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I posed my challenge problem primarily as a response to Andreas' position.
> Andreas, please rewrite the *very small* example in the linked-to paper
> (Also at
> <https://code.google.com/p/es-lab/source/browse/trunk/src/ses/contract/>) in
> terms of the uniform non-flattening semantics you desire.

Hi Mark,

sorry for not having followed up on that, but for one, too much of my
bandwidth was eaten up by the modules thread for a sufficiently
detailed reply, and secondly, I felt that Tab was already doing a
terrific job of answering it (and generally unraveling most of the
misunderstandings in this thread). Also, it already was weekend over
here. :)

So what Tab said, in reply to your challenge and elsewhere.

/Andreas
Received on Monday, 29 April 2013 14:26:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:37:49 UTC