W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: Futures (was: Request for JSON-LD API review)

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:15:05 +0100
Message-ID: <CADnb78g-3Wom3uEVkuFwKmWNH0ZdxwxH3R4iy=jUxBfXq8Tmjw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Mark S. Miller" <erights@google.com>
Cc: es-discuss <es-discuss@mozilla.org>, Douglas Crockford <douglas@crockford.com>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, Norbert Lindenberg <w3@norbertlindenberg.com>, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote:
> I don't find the whole who owns what discussions very interesting to
> be honest. If it was up to me JavaScript would just be part of the W3C
> and we would not have to deal with that layer of distraction.

I got some private feedback that this might have come across as some
kind of power grab. What I meant, as in my mind TC39 and JavaScript
are kinda intertwined, is that TC39 would become part of the W3C
rather than ECMA, so coordination between those working on browser
APIs and those working on the language would be even more of a given.
Taking JavaScript away from TC39 never crossed my mind, but reportedly
it did for others, so sorry about the confusion.


--
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2013 15:15:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:37:49 UTC