W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: Futures

From: Kevin Smith <zenparsing@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 23:58:27 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+mDt2yOD2tordJdcbAoVJGP_yL4i7DLSZG_xbwfUg=UVEz9PQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Cc: Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.com>, "Mark S. Miller" <erights@google.com>, Douglas Crockford <douglas@crockford.com>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, Norbert Lindenberg <w3@norbertlindenberg.com>, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, es-discuss <es-discuss@mozilla.org>
>
> In particular, I'd love to get TC39 to look over the "is-a-future"
> issue. I'm pretty worried about the current solution which makes
> "then" a magic property name. It's less bad than "__proto__" is, but
> not by a lot.
>

I agree - I'm putting together a list of a few issues with Futures that I
would like to see addressed, and this is one.

{ Kevin }
Received on Sunday, 21 April 2013 03:58:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:37:49 UTC