- From: David Bruant <bruant.d@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 14:01:47 +0200
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- CC: ext Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.com>, public-script-coord <public-script-coord@w3.org>
Le 14/04/2013 13:41, Arthur Barstow a écrit : > On 4/13/13 3:50 PM, ext Brendan Eich wrote: >> We could go API by API in a more focused forum or meeting-like >> setting, with public-script-coord hosting the notices for upcoming >> reviews, progress updates, and review conclusions. Thoughts? > I like this idea. Likewise. > Ideally, TC39 would review all W3C APIs as they progress Ideally, the people who will use these APIs (web developers come to mind :-) ) would review all W3C APIs as they progress. If we all want the web to be lighter (read: less libraries to load), we need to have JavaScript library authors involved. ECMA TC39 is a pay-to-play group and there is no reason whatsoever for anyone who wants to review web platform APIs to have to be part of TC39 David
Received on Sunday, 14 April 2013 12:02:16 UTC