Lachlan Hunt: > Is there any reason to leave RegExp unsupported in WebIDL? No, it sounds reasonable to have. I've added it: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#idl-RegExp http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#es-RegExp http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#dfn-distinguishable Similar to what Garrett pointed out with String.prototype.match, I've made conversions to the RegExp type pass the value to the RegExp constructor (if the value isn't already a RegExp object).Received on Thursday, 8 November 2012 00:39:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:30:07 UTC