Re: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional?

On 9/28/12 12:38 PM, Travis Leithead wrote:
> It seems more important to check for the features of the spec, rather than spec support in general. I would expect if (URL.createObjectURL) for example.

You have it backwards.  That's checking for the file API bits.  How do 
you check whether you can actually work with URL objects?

-Boris

Received on Friday, 28 September 2012 17:32:39 UTC