W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional?

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:32:07 -0400
Message-ID: <5065DF17.4080405@mit.edu>
To: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
CC: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 9/28/12 12:38 PM, Travis Leithead wrote:
> It seems more important to check for the features of the spec, rather than spec support in general. I would expect if (URL.createObjectURL) for example.

You have it backwards.  That's checking for the file API bits.  How do 
you check whether you can actually work with URL objects?

Received on Friday, 28 September 2012 17:32:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:37:47 UTC