W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: [WebIDL] cycles in [PutForward] chains

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 15:00:17 +1000
Message-ID: <501DFDE1.3080608@mcc.id.au>
To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, W3C Script Coordination <public-script-coord@w3.org>
Glenn Adams:
> i meant step 7 (not 6), but yes, it is well defined, though sub-step 4
> of step 7 will take a while to return if there is a cycle (and the
> implementation does nothing to detect it)

Right.  But anyway, I concur with Tab and Boris -- we should be such 
cases as specification errors and fixing them.
Received on Sunday, 5 August 2012 05:00:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:30:06 UTC