On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > Marcos Caceres: > > The binding part… the syntax part is a different matter. The syntax >> part is much more clear (though it would have been nice if it would >> have been written for a parser), but the only proper parser I've seen >> has issues in that it's machine generated: >> >> https://github.com/darobin/**webidl.js<https://github.com/darobin/webidl.js> >> > > I'm not sure what you mean about being written for a parser. A grammar > is a perfect basis for a parser, no? :) (And you can't get much simpler > than an LL(1) grammar for a language like this, in terms of writing a > parser.) > FWIW, I've found the grammar to be extremely useful for building the parser we're using for Gecko. - Kyle
Received on Saturday, 24 March 2012 19:05:47 UTC