W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > January to March 2012

[Bug 16496] Confusing statement

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 00:52:49 +0000
To: public-script-coord@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1SBFDt-0001id-7N@jessica.w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16496

Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #1 from Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> 2012-03-24 00:52:48 UTC ---
Yes that is confusingly worded.  What I mean to say is that if there is an
exception interface object (because sometimes there isn't, due to
[NoInterfaceObject]) then it will have a property for each constant as long as
the property name is not "prototype".

I forgot though that I've already forbidden any IDL definitions from having the
name "prototype", so I can drop that conditional.

I've reworded it by talking about the exception interface prototype object
first.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 24 March 2012 00:52:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:30:05 UTC