W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > January to March 2012

[Bug 16440] interface prototype object.

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 23:35:07 +0000
To: public-script-coord@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1SAV3b-0002eO-Mm@jessica.w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16440

Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #1 from Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> 2012-03-21 23:35:06 UTC ---
You're right that interface objects will have a prototype property regardless,
just due to the fact that they are Function objects.  But I think that
interface objects for callback interfaces shouldn't be Function objects -- it'd
probably be strange if they are, given that they're required not to have a
prototype property and really just exist as a place to put constants.

I've reworded:

 
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2006/webapi/WebIDL/Overview.xml.diff?r1=1.492;r2=1.493;f=h

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 21 March 2012 23:35:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:30:05 UTC