W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: [TreatNonCallableAsNull] alternative?

From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 12:14:12 +0000
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, public-script-coord@w3.org, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Message-ID: <1CFD23AB648F42A181E3B27FCD7641C2@marcosc.com>



On Wednesday, 7 March 2012 at 11:47, Anne van Kesteren wrote:

> On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 12:24:31 +0100, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com (mailto:w3c@marcosc.com)> wrote:
> > FWIW, I'm swinging towards agreeing with Cam hereā€¦ maybe DOM4 is  
> > actually the right place to define this in the manner that he states  
> > above. DOM4 does govern event handlers after all.
>  
> FYI, it doesn't. (There's a suggestion that maybe it should, but it's not  
> clear how to split from HTML.)

Is there a thread where that is being discussed? Maybe we can drag Hixie into this one?   


--  
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2012 12:14:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:30:05 UTC