W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: New full Unicode for ES6 idea

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 11:00:04 +0100
To: "Norbert Lindenberg" <ecmascript@norbertlindenberg.com>, "Brendan Eich" <brendan@mozilla.com>
Cc: es-discuss <es-discuss@mozilla.org>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, mranney@voxer.com
Message-ID: <op.v98beewo64w2qv@annevk-macbookpro.local>
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 04:50:28 +0100, Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.com>  
wrote:
> Norbert Lindenberg wrote:
>> OK - migrations are hard. But so far most participants have only seen  
>> additional work, no benefits. How long will this take? When will it  
>> end? When will browsers make BRS-on the default, let alone eliminate  
>> the switch? When can Roozbeh abandon his original version? Where's the  
>> blue button?
>
> It may be that the BRS is worse than an incompatible change to "full  
> Unicode" as Allen proposed last year. But in either case, something gets  
> harder for Roozbeh. Which is worse?

Is the benefit of doing this switch at all large enough? Even though it  
becomes somewhat easier to deal with 💩 you still have grapheme clusters  
you will need to work around. That is, it is not clear code points are the  
right abstraction point and then you might as well keep 16-bit code units  
with support for surrogate code points so you can render everything above  
BMP too.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Saturday, 25 February 2012 10:00:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:30:05 UTC