> > I meant ECMA-262 punts source normalization upstream in the spec pipeline > that runs parallel to the browser's loading-the-URL | processing-what-was- > loaded pipeline. ECMA-262 is concerned only with its little slice of processing > heaven. Yep. One of the problems is that the source script may not be using a Unicode encoding or may be using a Unicode encoding and be serialized in a non-normalized form. Your slice of processing heaven treats Unicode-normalization-equivalent-yet-different-codepoint-sequence tokens as unequal. Not that this is a bad thing. > > > By contrast, providing a method for normalizing strings would be useful. > /summon Norbert. (hides the breakables, listens for thunder) AddisonReceived on Tuesday, 21 February 2012 16:57:43 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:30:05 UTC