W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: [TreatNonCallableAsNull] alternative?

From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:31:09 +0000
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: public-script-coord@w3.org, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Message-ID: <C29D6F9A12304F9FA6EAE4C4578C5BCC@marcosc.com>



On Thursday, 16 February 2012 at 16:25, Anne van Kesteren wrote:

> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:50:12 +0100, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu (mailto:bzbarsky@mit.edu)> wrote:
> > If you're writing IDL for something that's already in the wild with this
> > behavior, you need it.
> >  
> > If you're writing a spec for something new, you don't.
>  
> Are you sure?
>  
> I think we'd want all event handler attributes to behave the same way.

That would be nice … [TreatNonCallableAsNull]'s behaviour is actually quite nice and forgiving (which is why I wanted to use it in the first place).


--  
Marcos Caceres

http://datadriven.com.au  
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2012 16:31:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:30:05 UTC