- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:43:35 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15986 --- Comment #10 from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> 2012-02-15 15:43:34 UTC --- I recall what the argument for keeping overloads was now. With just unions and optional args, there is no way to express this overload set: void f(long x, long y); void f(long x, long y, long width, long height); which some specs definitely wanted... -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2012 15:43:41 UTC