W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > January to March 2012

[Bug 15986] Specify exactly how and when ECMAScript arguments are evaluated

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:13:59 +0000
To: public-script-coord@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1RxPhH-0005nP-IQ@jessica.w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15986

--- Comment #6 from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> 2012-02-14 21:13:58 UTC ---
> I wonder, might a object defined in ECMAScript meet all the type requirements
> of an Web IDL interface while still producing side-effects on certain property
> accesses.

Only for callback interfaces and dictionaries (for which the spec using them
would in fact have to define exact behavior).

> or is some form of nominal typing required.

Right now the spec requires it, yes.  There's all sorts of state that DOM
objects of various sorts store internally but don't expose via public APIS that
DOM objects need to be able to get to, such that in most cases duck typing
would at best lead to exceptions thrown early on (just like nominal typing) and
at worst lead to data structures in undefined states...

This does complicate a pure ES implementation of the DOM, of course.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 14 February 2012 21:14:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:30:05 UTC