W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > January to March 2012

RE: publish new LCWD of Web IDL; deadline February 3

From: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:45:51 +0000
To: public-script-coord <public-script-coord@w3.org>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9768D477C67135458BF978A45BCF9B383820675D@TK5EX14MBXW603.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
I agree to publish.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com]
>Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 4:10 AM
>To: public-webapps; public-script-coord
>Subject: CfC: publish new LCWD of Web IDL; deadline February 3
>
>Cameron has completed addressing open Web IDL comments including LC #2
>comments [1] and the only open bugs are enhancement requests [2]. As
>such, this is Call for Consensus to publish a new Last Call Working
>Draft using the following ED as the basis:
>
>    http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/
>
>This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to "record the group's
>decision to request advancement" for this LCWD.
>
>Note the Process Document states the following regarding the
>significance/meaning of a LCWD:
>
>[[
>http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#last-call
>
>Purpose: A Working Group's Last Call announcement is a signal that:
>
>* the Working Group believes that it has satisfied its relevant
>technical requirements (e.g., of the charter or requirements document)
>in the Working Draft;
>
>* the Working Group believes that it has satisfied significant
>dependencies with other groups;
>
>* other groups SHOULD review the document to confirm that these
>dependencies have been satisfied. In general, a Last Call announcement
>is also a signal that the Working Group is planning to advance the
>technical report to later maturity levels.
>]]
>
>Positive response to this CfC is preferred and encouraged and silence
>will be considered as agreement with the proposal. The deadline for
>comments is February 3. Please send all comments to:
>
>   public-script-coord@w3.org
>
>-Art Barstow
>
>[1] http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/lc2.txt
>[2]
>https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?product=WebAppsWG&component=WebI
>DL&resolution=---
>
>
>-------- Original Message --------
>Subject: 	Re: RfC: pre-LC comments for Web IDL; deadline January 17
>Date: 	Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:11:27 +1100
>From: 	ext Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
>To: 	Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
>CC: 	public-script-coord <public-script-coord@w3.org>
>
>
>
>Arthur Barstow:
>>  Rather than immediately starting a CfC to publish a new LCWD, let's
>>  first have a two week pre-LC Request for Comments period using the
>>  latest ED as the basis:
>>
>>  http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/
>
>Comments over this period have been addressed.  We should publish now.
>I have begun to prepare the two documents for publication:
>
>   http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/
>   http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/java.html
>
>The pubrules checker seems to be broken at the moment, so I haven't done
>that yet.
>
>
Received on Friday, 27 January 2012 17:46:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:30:05 UTC