Hi, A couple of question on the new iterator syntax: * is it intentional that "iterator" is not among the accepted names for arguments? * in your mail, you state that > the iterator object interface must be declared like > so: > interface NodeIterator { > Node iterator object; > }; Yet the examples in the spec for SessionIterator don't use that syntax. Am I confused? DomReceived on Thursday, 28 June 2012 15:10:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:30:06 UTC