Re: Distinguishability checking for nullable unions is not correct from Cameron McCormack on 2012-06-22 (public-script-coord@w3.org from April to June 2012)

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 12:16:37 +1000
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
CC: public-script-coord@w3.org
Message-ID: <4FE3D585.3090605@mcc.id.au>

Boris Zbarsky:
> I believe the simplest way to fix is to say that the "at
> most one of the two is a nullable type" check should also check for
> nullable member types of unions.  Or something.

Agreed, fixed:

http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2006/webapi/WebIDL/Overview.xml.diff?r1=1.537;r2=1.538;f=h

Received on Friday, 22 June 2012 02:17:10 UTC