Re: [WebIDL] toJSON from Kyle Huey on 2012-06-06 (public-script-coord@w3.org from April to June 2012)

From: Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 18:37:56 -0700
To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Cc: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>, Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.org>, David Bruant <bruant.d@gmail.com>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAP045Ao8UufrUJ7bSzz3=UgigrWGpDW7v8c50NeuJ5qGrd0VPQ@mail.gmail.com>

>
> 2. Does it make sense as an API design guideline to, for all objects
>   that have a toJSON extension, try to have constructors that can take
>   a JSON objects to initialize the object with?  For example:
>

IMO, no.  It doesn't make sense for the DOM performance object, for
instance.

- Kyle

Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2012 01:38:25 UTC