- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 17:59:52 +1000
- To: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- CC: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, public-webapps@w3.org, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
Cameron McCormack: >>> Would it make sense to require objects that are returned from a >>> constructor be associated with the same global that the constructor >>> itself is? Boris Zbarsky: >> That seems like the simplest approach to me, yes. It's what Gecko does in >> practice anyway at the moment, afaict. Adam Barth: > Note: WebKit has bugs in this regard, but we've been (slowly!) > converging towards Gecko's behavior, which we believe is aesthetically > correct. OK, I've made this change. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2006/webapi/WebIDL/Overview.xml.diff?r1=1.519;r2=1.520;f=h
Received on Monday, 9 April 2012 08:00:41 UTC