W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > October to December 2011

RE: Web IDL: LC2 feedback

From: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 20:13:03 +0000
To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
CC: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9768D477C67135458BF978A45BCF9B38381C8DBD@TK5EX14MBXW602.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Cameron McCormack [mailto:cam@mcc.id.au]
>On 19/10/11 11:05 AM, Travis Leithead wrote:
>> We should consider adding "at risk" identification on features that
>> we expect might be cut (for example: modules). In this way they can
>> be removed during CR w/out dropping the spec status down to Working
>> draft again.
>
>With modules and the Java binding now out of the document, I don't know
>of any features that would be in this category.  So I won't add an "at
>risk" identification for now.  If there are features other than these
>that you think should be considered "at risk", let me know.

Sounds good. Thanks for the follow-up.

-Travis
Received on Monday, 12 December 2011 20:13:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:30:05 UTC