W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: Lazy interface objects?

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:25:05 -0400
Message-ID: <4E7A4821.1060108@mit.edu>
To: public-script-coord@w3.org
On 9/21/11 3:50 PM, David Flanagan wrote:
> So far, I'm concentrating on the DOM and have not really though about
> the global object.

But this thread is about properties on the global object....

> Maybe when dom.js is used in some special embedding of spidermonkey, I'll be able to proxy the global object. But for a pure
> JS DOM, without special embedding I don't think that using a proxy for
> the global object is possible.

I'm not sure what you mean by "not possible" here"

You can always implement the global exposed to the DOM as a proxy, I 
would think...

-Boris
Received on Wednesday, 21 September 2011 20:25:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:30:04 UTC