W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: [[Call]] behaviour of operations

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 21:25:46 +1000
Message-ID: <4E69F7BA.8040706@mcc.id.au>
To: Geoffrey Sneddon <gsneddon@opera.com>
CC: Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen@wirfs-brock.com>, public-script-coord@w3.org
On 29/08/11 9:08 PM, Geoffrey Sneddon wrote:
> Right, so to be consistent with ES built-ins, my suggestion would be
> simply to add a step 0 to the first list in #es-operations saying:
>
> "If the interface on which the operation appears has an [ImplicitThis]
> extended attribute, and the this value is null or undefined, then let O
> be the ECMAScript global object associated with the Function object."
>
> And change step 1 to start with "Otherwise,".

I've made this change (or thereabouts).

http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2006/webapi/WebIDL/Overview.html.diff?r1=1.396;r2=1.397;f=h
Received on Friday, 9 September 2011 11:26:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:30:04 UTC