W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: [WebIDL] Handling undefined in Overload Resolution Algorithm

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 22:35:14 +1200
Message-ID: <4E538262.7030903@mcc.id.au>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
CC: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, public-script-coord@w3.org, bzbarsky@mit.edu, allen@wirfs-brock.com 
On 23/08/11 10:27 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> FWIW, today I changed XMLHttpRequest's open() from being overloaded to
> simply having optional arguments. I hope they are considered identical.

I doubt I'll be removing that equivalence, so that should be fine.
Received on Tuesday, 23 August 2011 10:36:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:30:04 UTC