W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: [WebIDL] platform array objects

From: Mark S. Miller <erights@google.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 21:54:08 -0700
Message-ID: <CABHxS9gy5HR_Rgxe2g208YLYy_WSkoVZWGkuyWf=N_QMh6OtYw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Cc: Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen@wirfs-brock.com>, public-script-coord <public-script-coord@w3.org>, andrew@ado.is-a-geek.net, Tom Van Cutsem <tvcutsem@vub.ac.be>

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote:

> On 19/08/11 3:00 PM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
>> To be able to implement platform array objects with proxies, we need to
>> expose configurable properties, since last I checked the Proxy proposal
>> did not support exposing non-configurable properties. If this has
>> changed, then I agree we should make it non-configurable.
> I notice now though that I do have properties for [Unforgeable] IDL
> attributes be non-configurable.
> Mark, Allen: what is the latest status on the Proxy proposal?  Is it
> possible for Proxy-implemented objects to expose non-configurable
> properties?

Not yet. Tom (cc'ed) will be proposing at the upcoming end-of-september
meeting. I expect it to pass.

Received on Friday, 19 August 2011 04:54:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:37:45 UTC