On 6/30/11 6:50 AM, ext Cameron McCormack wrote: > Arthur Barstow: >> Positive response to this CfC is preferred and encouraged and >> silence will be considered as agreement with the proposal. > +1 from me, obviously. [I was worried about that ;-)] Assuming there is consensus to publish this LCWD, a couple of administrative details: 1. Length of the LC review: given the relatively broad interest, I would recommend 6 weeks minimum. WDYT? 2. W3C Groups to review: at least the following WGs: WebApps, HTML, SVG, Web Performance, Web Notifications, DAP, Web Events, Geolocation. Are there any other groups? 3. TC39: after the LC is published (and July 12 would be earliest date), perhaps you or PLH should notify them of the publication -ABReceived on Thursday, 30 June 2011 11:05:01 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:30:03 UTC