- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 01:55:47 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11267 --- Comment #11 from Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> 2011-06-24 01:55:46 UTC --- Sorry to bikeshed, but isn't the bigger effect that [NonConfigureable] has the fact that it moves the property from the prototype to the leaf object? If so, wouldn't something like [LeafProperty] or [ObjectProperty] be a better name? Also, what happens for if something has [NonConfigureable] (or [LeafProperty] or [ObjectProperty] or whatever) but isn't marked as readonly? Is that invalid IDL or does that have some meaning? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Friday, 24 June 2011 01:55:48 UTC