On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 02:22:12 +0100, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: > The other alternatives involve creating some parallel API, along one > of the following lines: > > foo.style.topValue.px = 200 > foo.style.topPX = 200 > foo.styleValues.top.px = 200 > > Of these options, I think the last one is probably the best, because > it's easy to feature-test for from script. The only problem is that > "styleValues" is kind of a bad name. I'm sure there are better > possibilities though. I guess we should do something like that then. I personally think a new member on CSSStyleDeclaration would be better so we do not need to introduce a whole new series of accessors. Thoughts? -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/Received on Tuesday, 23 February 2010 10:50:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:30:02 UTC