W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: DOMString-like objects for the CSSOM

From: Mark S. Miller <erights@google.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 07:44:05 -0800
Message-ID: <4d2fac901002190744l518d8768ye8640307280e2fb6@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:25:44 +0100, Mark S. Miller <erights@google.com>
> wrote:
>
>> This is yet another example of why WebIDL is a bad language for designing
>> JavaScript APIs. The choices encouraged by WebIDL, and that seem natural
>> in WebIDL, often result in bad JavaScript API designs.
>>
>
> I'm not sure what you mean. We're not starting to reason based on Web IDL.
> We're simply trying to extend a legacy API and I'm wondering how to express
> that in Web IDL.


How do you propose your new DOMString-like object be represented in
JavaScript?



>
>
> --
> Anne van Kesteren
> http://annevankesteren.nl/
>



-- 
    Cheers,
    --MarkM
Received on Friday, 19 February 2010 15:44:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:30:02 UTC