W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-schemaorg@w3.org > January 2019

Re: Gift property in schema.org

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 16:31:21 +0000
Message-ID: <CAK-qy=5weCDQr8MPF05MWsxPHfKF7DjjFjPk4KaWUkr2aBtnmA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bebemovil <info@bebemovil.com>
Cc: Michael Andrews <nextcontent01@gmail.com>, Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>, "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 at 16:26, Bebemovil <info@bebemovil.com> wrote:

> Best regards for everyone.
>
> Finally we have decided put "addOn" property to indicates "+ Gift" value
> in Offer item.
>
> One question: Does anyone  know if google will add this property as rich
> snippet in SERPs?
>
We try not to get too deep into search-engine specific discussions here,
especially when speculative. As things stand afaik we don't use "addOn" for
product snippets or similar. If we do something it should show up in
Google's structured data markup documentation.

Dan



> Thanks in advance
>
> El 07/01/2019 a las 13:07, Dan Brickley escribió:
>
> Yeah, this sounds plausible as a modelinf idiom. As ever I'd suggest - in
> the absence of other guidance - to lean towards the laziest option.
> Schema.org was fundamentally intended to be *easy* for publishers. If some
> consuming app asks for gift aspects to be explicitly modelled, that would
> be a good reason to put more time into breaking out those details...
>
> Dan
>
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019, 11:46 Michael Andrews <nextcontent01@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> +1 for Richard's suggestion regarding using addOn.  That makes sense, and
>> could cover a range of scenarios.
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 4:59 PM Richard Wallis <
>> richard.wallis@dataliberate.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thinking about it a little further...
>>>
>>> Potentially the Offer <https://schema.org/Offer> describing the 'gift'
>>> could be be an addOn <https://schema.org/addOn> to an offer to purchase.
>>>
>>> ~Richard.
>>> Richard Wallis
>>> Founder, Data Liberate
>>> http://dataliberate.com
>>> Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis
>>> Twitter: @rjw
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 at 11:17, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019, 10:43 Bebemovil <info@bebemovil.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi friends.
>>>>>
>>>>> We are a baby online shop and we have offers with gifts included.
>>>>>
>>>>> We have not encountered a gift property to indicates to google that
>>>>> our
>>>>> offer includes a gift for buyer totally free.
>>>>>
>>>>> How can we do it? to google serp shows rich snippets of gifts
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We haven't really gone into that level of detail. For now, it would be
>>>> simplest to just summarize any "gift" aspects of an offer within its
>>>> textual description.
>>>>
>>>> Dan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>
Received on Monday, 7 January 2019 16:31:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 7 January 2019 16:31:57 UTC