Re: Schema.org and protege

thank you guys,

I have used  https://schema.org/docs/schemaorg.owl
<https://schema.org/docs/schemaorg.owl>  but as stated it downloaded all of
schema.org, do you guys recommend another tool rather than protege which is
as good?

Thanks,
Thejas





On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 11:52 AM Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Sat, 13 Apr 2019, 02:11 Nicolas Torzec, <torzecn@verizonmedia.com>
> wrote:
>
>> The "schemaorg.owl" file that Richard pointed out can be loaded into
>> Protégé.
>>
>> But note that all schema.org properties will be seen as object
>> properties in Protégé. Schema.org (RDF in general) doesn't distinguish
>> between datatype properties and object properties. Schema.org datatypes
>> (e.g. Boolean, Number, Text, etc.) are just RDFs classes and, because all
>> schema.org properties have Text and URL in their range implicitly by
>> default, they all become object properties during the OWL conversion
>> process.
>>
>
>
> "because all schema.org properties have Text and URL in their range
> implicitly by default"
>
> I don't believe we quite say that...
>
> Dan
>
> -N.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 1:17 PM Richard Wallis <
>> richard.wallis@dataliberate.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Thejas,
>>>
>>> If you use https://schema.org/docs/schemaorg.owl  you will find the
>>> domain & range values that are understood by Protégé.
>>>
>>> Checkout  https://schema.org/docs/developers.html#experiments for
>>> details.
>>>
>>> ~Richard.
>>> Richard Wallis
>>> Founder, Data Liberate
>>> http://dataliberate.com
>>> Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis
>>> Twitter: @rjw
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 20:23, Umutcan Simsek <umutcan.simsek@sti2.at>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> The range and domain properties of schema.org are not supported by
>>>> protégé. You need to replace does with rdfs:domain and rdfs:range in the
>>>> schema file you are trying to import. Although this would be probably
>>>> enough for protégé to load the schema.org properly, you would still
>>>> need to work on the property definitions to make distinction between
>>>> datatype and object properties.
>>>>
>>>> Alternatively, you can try the experimental owl mapping,
>>>> https://schema.org/docs/datamodel.html.
>>>> I am not sure if this one is up to date.
>>>>
>>>> Greetings
>>>> Umut
>>>>
>>>> Sent from mobile
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 11, 2019 19:20, Thejas Prasad <thejchess@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I had a quick question on how to import the ontology from schema.org
>>>> into protege. I am able to import the ontology, however, the object
>>>> properties are not imported. I was hoping someone from this list could
>>>> provide into how to import the ontology.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Thejas
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
>>>> service.
>>>> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
>>>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 11, 2019 19:20, Thejas Prasad <thejchess@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I had a quick question on how to import the ontology from schema.org
>>>> into protege. I am able to import the ontology, however, the object
>>>> properties are not imported. I was hoping someone from this list could
>>>> provide into how to import the ontology.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Thejas
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
>>>> service.
>>>> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
>>>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>