- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2018 13:56:44 -0700
- To: ilyaigpetrov@gmail.com
- Cc: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>, "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAK-qy=4WfD8Y-nrQcQsOCXMaOw6ZqibxyiQeukDb0qynbpeNVA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 at 11:28, Ilya Petrov <ilyaigpetrov@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you for your reply, Richard.
> Could you or someone please guide me how microdata markup should look
> like, here is how I currently try to do it:
>
> <head>
> ...
> <script type="application/ld+json">
>
> {"description":"...","author":"...","@type":"CollectionPage","url":"...",...}
> // This was generated by a static site generator.
> </script>
> </head>
> <body>
> <main>
> <a href="https://springfield-xxxx.us" itemtype="
> https://schema.org/WebSite">Official site of Springfield</a>
> <a href="https://facebook.com/group/XXXX" itemtype="
> https://schema.org/WebPage">Local events in Springfield</a>
> <a href="https://news.us/city/springfield-xxxx" itemtype="
> https://schema.org/WebPage">Latest news in Springfield</a>
> </main>
> </body>
>
> I use https://schema.org/WebPage instead of http://schema.org/WebPage
> (httpS over http), I hope it's ok.
> I also don't define CollectionPage on <main>, <body> or <html>, because
> it's already defined in the JSON-LD script, I hope it's also ok.
>
> If this mail-list is not a place for such questions, please, let me know.
>
It's not the best place for such questions really. Not to be unfriendly but
since there are literally millions of sites using Schema.org, we're not
really set up here to deal with that scale of question-answering. You might
try stack overflow or similar sites if people from here can't help you, but
yeah best to move this kind of question offlist. There is also the larger
matter that the markup might be broadly correct but not particularly
useful. For example at Google, while it is true that we can treat lots of
bits of schema.org as a kind of signal (helping us to understand the
general content of your pages), we generally nudge people towards putting
their time/effort primarily into markup associated with explicitly
documented search features, i.e.
https://developers.google.com/search/docs/guides/search-features . While
this seems a reasonable way to use CollectionPage I'm not aware of any such
features that would make great use of the markup currently.
cheers,
Dan
> Thank you for your help,
> Ilya.
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:34 PM, Richard Wallis <
> richard.wallis@dataliberate.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ilya,
>>
>> I would use CollectionPage <http://schema.org/CollectionPage>. However
>> I would describe each ‘link’ as a WebPage <http://schema.org/WebPage> or
>> WebSite <http://schema.org/WebSite> with its *url* being the link.
>>
>> ~Richard.
>>
>> Richard Wallis
>> Founder, Data Liberate
>> http://dataliberate.com
>> Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis
>> Twitter: @rjw
>>
>> On 31 May 2018 at 09:55, Ilya Petrov <ilyaigpetrov@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> What is the best schema for a page <https://sukhoylog.github.io/sites>
>>> that contains a categorized list of local sites/urls of my small town?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Ilya.
>>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Saturday, 2 June 2018 20:57:27 UTC