Re: Nutritional Facts Label = NutritionInformation ?

seeAlso: https://github.com/ouisharelabs/food-dashboard

Note issue 6

On Mon., 1 May 2017, 4:58 pm Jim Saiya, <jsaiya@formatdata.com> wrote:

> Hmm, http://schema.org/NutritionInformation would be used to mark up
> information on a web page, which might be presented to look like a
> Nutrition Facts label (some recipe sites do this), but would that make it
> one?  My feeling is https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1531970 is meant to
> indicate a label on a product package, as opposed to the collection of the
> data itself.  Maybe this would be enough difference so they are not
> equivalent.
>
> Then again, http://data.lirmm.fr/ontologies/food#NutritionData has
> already been linked as an equivalent class, and its definition, "Nutrition
> data for a food item (recipe, product or ingredient)" *does* more closely
> align with the schema.org definition.  If it works for them...?
>   *Jim Saiya*
> XML Analyst Developer
> Detroit, MI
>
> ✆ *703.731.5119*
> ✉ jsaiya@formatdata.com
> [in] www.linkedin.com/in/jimsaiya
>
> *On Mon, 01 May 2017 03:01:17 +0000, Thad Guidry wrote:*
>
> Hi Gordon and Dan,
>
> I've begun updating Wikidata with new types and properties from 3.2
> release...so a question so far...
>
> Would we say that http://schema.org/NutritionInformation is equivalent to
> a Nutritional Facts Label ?
>
> http://schema.org/NutritionInformation
> equivalent to
> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1531970
>
> ???
>
> Furthermore... it might be wise to also include this as a New Type to
> avoid confusion. A Nutrition guide : any reference or document that
> provides nutrition advice for general health
> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q29639302
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nutrition_guides
>
> Thoughts ?
> -Thad
>