W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-schemaorg@w3.org > March 2016

Re: Schema.org generator

From: Hans Polak <info@polak.es>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:13:55 +0100
To: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>
Cc: "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <56EC1B33.2060805@polak.es>
Hi Richard,

Thanks for the kind words. Let me answer your questions.

  * This /only/ generates Microdata. I thought JSON (at least) already
    has a tool.
  * This doesn't, actually, validate against the Google testing tool.
    The user has to /manually/ copy and paste it. So, any tool should work.
  * If I understand this correctly, my tool can handle related types
    without any problem (AJAX).
  * It will /only/ output the information provided by the user. So, if
    the user adds both...
  * The user is in charge of choosing the subtype. The tool will handle
    that.
  * Yes, it does track schema.org. The bot can be set-up to check every
    24 hours, more often, less often...
  * At this moment, only the core will be handled.
    http://schema.org/docs/full.html

Hans


On 03/18/2016 02:06 PM, Richard Wallis wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> This looks interesting.  I have not as yet had time to delve into the 
> technical documentation, but the following questions come to mind 
> looking at the documentation.
>
>   * Will it produce all three serialisations as output - Microdata,
>     RDFa, JSON-LD
>   * Will it validate against more than just the Google testing tool
>   * How does it handle related types.  i.e.. A /PriceSpecification/
>     linked to an /Offer/ for a /Product/ offered by a /seller/
>     /Organisation/
>   * How will it handle properties with more than one type in its range
>      e.g.. for /creator/ how to choose to create /Person/ or
>     /Organization/ schema
>   * How will you choose which subtype to create e.g A property
>     expecting a CreativeWork could reference a /Book, /a/Painting,/ or
>     a /SoftwareApplication/
>   * Does it track the evolution of the vocabulary - getting its
>     structure from the live schema.org <http://schema.org> site
>   * Will it handle extensions such as bib.schema.org
>     <http://bib.schema.org>
>
> ~Richard
>
> Richard Wallis
> Founder, Data Liberate
> http://dataliberate.com
> Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis
> Twitter: @rjw
>
> On 18 March 2016 at 12:21, Hans Polak <info@polak.es 
> <mailto:info@polak.es>> wrote:
>
>     I've uploaded everything to Github.
>
>     https://github.com/GUI-Junkie/Schema.org-Generator
>
>     Yours sincerely,
>     Hans Polak
>
>
>     On 03/18/2016 10:58 AM, Hans Polak wrote:
>>     Good morning,
>>
>>     Yesterday, I released a software package for schema.org
>>     <http://schema.org> under the GNU GPL.
>>
>>     This software generates valid schema's in HTML5 format. I would
>>     like to integrate this at http://schema.org/generator/ if
>>     possible. Here is the Online Help
>>     <http://polak.es/generator_help/index.html>
>>
>>     The system requirements are: Python3 (with or without Apache2).
>>     Here is the Technical documentation
>>     <http://polak.es/generator_tech/index.html>
>>
>>     tar.gz <http://polak.es/generator.tar.gz> file, checksums
>>     <http://polak.es/en/generator.html>
>>
>>     Yours sincerely,
>>     Hans Polak
>>
>
>
Received on Friday, 18 March 2016 15:14:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 18 March 2016 15:14:27 UTC